George Monbiot has a thought provoking piece on the Guardian’s website. He discusses our Prime Minister’s attitudes to bombing and to global warming, concluding, if I’ve understood, that Mr Cameron has chosen the most dangerous option for British voters in each case.
“Of the 11 military adventures the researchers analysed, they found that five had had no discernible impacts on subsequent terrorism; six were followed by more terrorism than there had been before.”
“A study published in Nature Climate Change last month found that if climate breakdown is not curtailed by the end of this century, temperatures in parts of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Kuwait, Iraq and Iran “are likely to approach and exceed” the levels that human beings can survive in. That doesn’t sound to me like a formula for peace on Earth.”
Don’t worry about the predictable surge in refugees because Mr Osborne’s economic predictions depend on an increase in working age migrants to Britain.
Presumably, the incomers will be seeking homes in the Highlands as Essex will have joined the rest of Doggerland, under the North Sea. On Syria, a post on Edgar Broughton’s First Supper blog expresses my thoughts more clearly than I could myself.
The reason why I cannot express my own thoughts with much clarity lies in my utter frustration with the wilful stupidity of our political leaders. What a shame that the most notable politicians speaking for effective responses are dragging such nasty baggage.
If I ever get round to a post on the lack of balance in the debates on wind turbines and rewilding, quotes from George Monbiot could be to the fore there, too.